What are some of the things an organisation might do to reframe the conversation?
To my mind, there are three things worth focusing on.
The first is to consider running a comprehensive cloud optimisation health check – one that covers costs, security, and governance. It provides assurance that their bills are right, and their security is on-point. If they aren’t, we’ll quickly spot those gaps, and show how and where we can improve them. More often than not, a health check can save the customer immediately – often more than 30% of their Azure bill. I consider those to be powerful numbers.
Second, is there a recurring element? Health checks will resolve ‘point-in-time’ problems. Of even greater benefit is to initiate plans that proactively manage ongoing issues. That could be using a trusted secure cloud managed service partner to proactively look at security, cost, and governance. It might be new technology advances – and AI is a prime example of this – that improve your environment. It might be filling a skills gap, either by hiring internally or calling in outside support. Or it could be a mix of all those elements.
More often than not, a health check can save the customer immediately, often more than 30% of their Azure bill. I consider those to be powerful numbers.
And the third is, if you do have legacy infrastructure you can’t decommission, have you considered a hybrid approach? We find a hybrid approach – one that really considers the life of your infrastructure – generally gives better outcomes. With Brennan, we can manage what’s static and stable, and give a fixed cost on that. It’s an approach that can build resilience against price elasticity with cloud providers to contain those shocks.